A Response to Nilofar Shidmehrs God Existed or Exists :: Nilofar Shidmehr God Existence Essays

A reception to Nilofar Shidmehrs idol Existed or ExistsIntroductionIn recent years, scientists contrive stick with to the amazing discovery that the existence of carbon-based life in our universe is reliant upon a set of extremely improbable initial conditions. In their article, The anthropic Teleological Argument,1 Betty and Cordell lay out some of these conditions in cosmology and biochemistry. Had mixed initial conditions of the universe been slightly altered, life would have been impossible. Betty and Cordell then manage that the existence of an intelligent actor is the best explanation for the universe. Needless to say, their conclusions have not gone unchallenged.Nilofar Shidmehr, in her article immortal Existed or Exists has presented tetrad dissents to Betty and Cordells Anthropic Teleological Argument (ATA). First, she shows that at best, ATA plainly shows that God existed, but not that God exists. Secondly, she argues that the dictum that the greater hou senot come from the lesser is false. Thirdly, she argues that There is a huge difference between having an explanation and sex act that there must be an explanation.2 Fourthly, Shidmehr presents three theories that increase the chances that the universe every which way evolved for the existence of carbon-based life. Thus, there is no need to invoke an intelligent designer. precondition these four objections, it seems evident that Shidmehr believes that ATA fails.In this paper, I will defend ATA against only two of Shidmehrs objections. I will argue against her first objection by showing that a sound analysis of ATA does give us soil to believe that God currently exists. Secondly, I will argue against her third objection by showing that the existence of God is a good explanation for the initial conditions of the universe. So without further adoI. God Existed AND ExistsShidmehrs first objection is to argue that there is no reason to believe that even if ATA is sound, God would not have to currently exist. Shidmehr writesIf we musical note around ourselves, we can see several well-designed buildings and goods whose creator or designer had died the existence of a creation and the continuity of its existence, since it came to being, are not interdependent upon the existence of its creator.3Secondly, Shidmehr goes on to say that there are several stories we can speculate to account for the demise of God. Suppose there was some fork of SuperGod that was unpleased with Gods creation of the universe causing SuperGod to destroy God.