'Nathaniel Hawthorne’s The House of the Seven Gables Essay\r'

'Hu piece natural processs and serviceman companionship ar 2 congenital entities. However, slew ar conf enforced whether cognition leads to actions or it is the actions that dictate maven’s wining. Moreover, several(prenominal) people said that the two have no difference at either; bingle is tantamount to the former(a) 1. This debatable issue is one of the conspicuous themes in Nathaniel Hawthorne’s The House of the s as yetsome Gables.\r\nSynopsis of the Story\r\n Set during the set of the 19th century in newfangled England, The House of Seven Gables is a sassy narrating the affairs of two families: the Pyncheons and the Maules. On the outgrowth p wile of the book, the tension between Colonel Pyncheon and Matthew Maule was paradeed. The colonel genuinely wanted the land avouched by Matthew Maule and so he giveed a plan which pointed the latter as a practitioner of witchcraft.\r\nFrom this accusation, Maule was sentenced to death with hanging. in front he fin each(prenominal)y dies, he whisper a curse for the colonel. Pyncheon, on the opposite hand, was precise happy upon receiving the land and st blinded to take a leak his kinsfolk of heptad gables. Unfortunately, in the carry day of the can’s opening, Colonel Pyncheon died from an hidden region reason. T give birthspeople guessed that it was the curse of Matthew Maule that leads for the colonel’s death, From thence on, the shack of the seven gables turned to be a gloomy and mysterious place.\r\n The nigh orbit of the story opened later century and a half with the present residents of the house, the sometime(a) lady Hepzibah and a certain(prenominal) Mr. Holgrave who was renting the room upstairs.\r\nThe author pass on then introduced new members of the family: Phoebe Pyncheon , a young, free- spirited, and helpful niece of Hepzibah, Clifford Pyncheon, br new(prenominal) of Hepzibah who was accused for murdering his uncle and p ass 30 years in imprisonment, count on Jaffrey Pyncheon, the evil cousin of Hepzibah and the one who set- up Clifford’s imprisonment. The figure wanted the rights for all the wealth of the Pyncheon family and so he visited Clifford, who harmonise to him knows the location of all the necessary documents he needs.\r\nWhile waiting for him though, Judge Jaffrey died from an unkn deliver reason. Frightened, Hepzibah and Clifford left the house. When they returned, Phoebe and Mr. Holgrave were already setting their marriage. Judge Jaffrey’s wicked actions were finally revealed by the investigation. Finally, Mr. Holgrave revealed that he is a descendent of Matthew Maule and that he excessively possesses hyp nonic powers. They went murder to a farm where they decided to have it off at. Hepzibah and Clifford, on the other hand, continued life sentence in the house of the seven gables.\r\nSimilarities and Differences of Sidney and Shelley\r\n Philip Sidney is an incline poet who have it offd in the Elizabethan age. He wrote the An acknowledgment for Poetry which presents his papers regarding the relationship between poem and areas of fellowship like history, ethics, and doctrine. One of the primary(prenominal) tenets of the book says that poetry volition consume more effectiveness if ethics will be observed in philosophy and liveliness will be integrated to history.\r\n Percy Bysshe Shelley, on the other hand, lived in the terminus of Romanticism in England. He was considered by many as one of the undischarged thinkers in the field of arts and philosophy. He is the husband of Mary Shelley, author of the new(a) Frankenstein. He to a fault wrote an essay authorize A Defence of Poetry. Here, he discussed what are his ideals for poetry and his radical opinions regarding the subject. Being a romanticist, Shelley believes that poets’ creations are not merely outcomes of their hold individualistic imagination but also effects of his interaction and exposure to common ideas.\r\n Both poets believe in the idea of romanticism. Romanticism supports the notion of deeply expressing one’s emotions and ideas do the use of arts, literature, music, and aesthetics. It is a form of revolution towards the aristocratic air division in Europe during the 18th century. Although Sidney did not live in this particular period, he showed already early signs of giving different and radical thinking towards literature, specifically to poetry. He in truth concentrated in formulating works about literary reforms, giving wildness in the relationship between art and virtue.\r\nFor Sidney, virtue is a guideline for poets to bring out works that can challenge people to move and to act righteously. Through this, a righteous action could be inspire by poetry which will be eventually transformed to experience.\r\n In addition, Sidney and Shelley, and even William Wordsworth, bel ieve in the idea that an operative and his society are two degage entities. When an artist creates an idea, he is genuinely manifesting a acquisitionâ€a expertness which Sidney equates to art. For him, this skill is something that one can learn and develop. In addition to this, Sidney strongly believes that we can get wind the objective world through constitution. formerly a poet has produced a creation, another nature is automatically cultivated.\r\nSidney followed the idea that gentlemans gentleman action is as the akin as knowledge. For him, all people, no matter what their inclinations areâ€arts, philosophy, science, and so forth, will eventually lead their commission to the utmost form of knowledgeâ€the knowledge of one’s self, giving grandeur to ethics and politics, and knowing not unaccompanied the virtuous but most importantly, doing the righteous actions. This for him is the explanation behind his idea that knowledge is just equal with clement a ctions.\r\n Shelley, however, believes that human actions and knowledge should not be regarded as the same or one. Rather, an individual has a separate identity from knowledge, specifically from the corporate mind. He talked about how a poet creates his induce ideas. For him, a poet uses twain his own individual knowledge and collective knowledge or archetypes. These archetypes are ideas that already serve as templates for the people. When a poet produced a creative idea, he does not simply rely on his really own knowledge. He actually uses some archetypes, therefore, relating what he has to what it is there in reality. And with this, Shelley disregards the idea that human knowledge is the same as human actions. It is actually human knowledge that leads people to their actions.\r\n outline of the Characters\r\n Applying the ideas of Sidney and Shelley in the story, the characters in Hawthorne’s story could be analyzed. The daguerreotypist Mr. Holgr ave was actually an artist himself who creates photographs using silver- coat plate and mercury vapor. A twenty-year old descendant of the late Matthew Maule, Mr. Holgrave was portrayed in the story as someone who maintains to live through different jobs. He skips from one occupation to the other. He also believes in surrendering wealth, custom, and even the past.\r\nA political radical, intellectually inclined, and with contemptuous view towards emotion, Mr. Holgrave often seeks the puff in his room at the house of seven gables. He seemed to be obscure with his society; even Hepzibah, the owner of the house he rents, barely knows him. He produced photographs, his very own creations, and through that, he is actually creating new environment for himself. His skills as a daguerreotypist were not considered merely as a skill, but an artâ€an art that through certain processes he was able to learn and develop. Everytime he takes pictures, Mr. Holgrave is sharpening even more his art and nurturing more his objective, his nature. Moreover, being a jack- of- all- trades, Mr. Holgrave has been ceaselessly going under processes of learning and growing various skills.\r\n Other characters in the apologue can be seen through this prospect of Sidney and Shelley. Judge Jaffrey, for example, as a man of intellect and wit, has the initial skills of implementing justice to the people. This is his own art. However, he chose not to develop this skill because of his extreme hunger for power and wealth, thus making him decided to edit-up his own cousin Clifford.\r\nIn the novel, he substantiate the greedy aspect of his ancestor Colonel Pyncheon. Moreover, as Sidney had imposed, his actions were equal to his knowledge. Being a judge requires one to be wise and clever. His knowledge about this was clearly seen through his actions as he became shrewd enough to plant his evil plans. If he would be subjected to Sidney’s ideas regarding the highest form of k nowledge, he would definitely leave out considering that he did not use his skills in striving to do the right action.\r\n withal Hepzibah, the current owner of the house of the seven gables, can be subjected using the philosophies of Sidney and Shelley. However, as it was proven in the text, Hepzibah can be concluded as an example of a person who could be characterized as the one that Shelley had described. Hepzibah uses first her own knowledge forrader doing a certain action. When she was running the cent- shop, she was unaccompanied thinking about her brother Clifford. Thus, it was reflected through her actions as she loses her focus everytime a customer goes to her. She shows ill-temperedness while scowling most of them.\r\n Phoebe, in comparison with Hepzibah, also concluded her actions through her own knowledge. In the novel, she was portrayed as a young, free- spirited, helpful, and obedient woman. However, if analyzed, Phoebe’s actions are j ust products of her shallow mood of thinking.\r\nShe seemed to be not so strange and more of an emotional lady, in blood with her lover Mr. Holgrave. Because of her personality, Mr. Holgrave was actually tempted to use his soporific powers to her. This clearly shows that Phoebe’s authority of thinking greatly affects her actions is highly given to be influenced or manipulated by other people whose knowledge is far get around than hers.\r\n Although Sidney and Shelley had their differences, the characters in The House of the Seven Gables could be also analyzed through the use of their similar ideas. As said earlier, Sidney and Shelley some(prenominal) believe that an individual and his society are two separated entities. In the novel, this philosophy was evidently portrayed by Hawthorne as each character found his various(prenominal) place into the society where he belongs.\r\nAnalysis of the Text\r\n After the analysis of some of the main charact ers, perspectives of Sidney and Shelley will also be tried to incorporate in the text, especially in analyzing the diagram and the themes presented in the novel.\r\n The plot evidently portrayed both foreseeable and unpredictable twists. The succession of events was creatively done through the use of suspense, good narration, and reasonable and organic unity. The idea of mystifying the house through the use of magic and curses was very effective. Hawthorne succeeded in creating his own art, in creating his own nature as Sidney and Shelley had pointed in their sermon about poetry and an artist’s skills.\r\n With regards to the themes of the novel, Hawthorne included the issue of family feuds, greed, and time. The novel was self-made because it started with an interesting conflict. The use of time frame was also great as the generations of both families were clearly seen. Finally, the concept of greed was also effective as it was used as the binding th eme for the novel’s plot.\r\nWork Cited\r\nHawthorne, Nathaniel. The House of the Seven Gables. the States: Pearson Education, 2000\r\n'