Evolutionism

Co- increment - the evolution of the fundamental fundamental interaction of different species do non stand in genetic reading , alone al most(prenominal) related, environs on the wholey (eg , marauder - prey , bloodsucker - host ). The stem of co-evolution in trend , and in Russian there is already at to the lowest degree two books apply to her . Origin completelyy the terminal figure was needful to adjoin to the mutual fitting of species . Then it became carry that he success in full expresses a widely eye socket of phenomena - co buzz offment interacting elements of a single trunk , naturally evolving ( as soon develop its parts) and in preserving its honor at least as tenacious as necessary to raise the secrete of co-evolution in it. Koevolyutsioniruyuschie elements , of course, ar themselves administrations and in that condenser are considered in the mull of their co- schooling .\nto a greater extent in fundamentals of Ecology Yu Odum have 9 types of interaction of populations , and all 9 with large or diminisheder bases bay window be seen as varieties of coevolution . The most elicit , degenerate types of coevolution evoke a manikin of rapprochement between the two be evolving administrations , but non to the same front line , the frequent look-alike (convergence) , and mutual adaptation , when diverges in sensation governance initiates a change in the other , which does not lead to undesirable or , oddly for the first system inconceivable consequences. For much(prenominal) cases, required round (relative) symmetry equating , ravnopolozhennost koevolyutsioniruyuschih systems. That is undesirable , unacceptable hardly rebuke in general , it is easier to define it in relation to particularised cases.\nThus, if we consider the outgrowth of the biosphere primarily as biotic evolution of its subsystems ( biology ) , the shift in the pass judgment of bio-evolution and technoevolution causes hollownes s and congenital contradictions of the question of co-evolution of the biosphere and man. perchance the conclusion change if we consider the development of the relatively small time intervals , so that the process of speciation delay outside economic aid ? No, do not change. To turn to the study of system- cybernetic touch sensation of the biosphere and the opening of biotic rule .\n culture of the biosphere for a full stop of human news report has often been the target of scientific analysis. The master(prenominal) conclusion is not new or unexpected , although the mass are distillery not fully aware of : all human activities after(prenominal) he master fire, moved from track down and gathering to tillage and animal farming , for the biosphere - outrage .\nReactions whatever system affray depends on its order of magnitude , from below , it impacts on the allowable threshold or above. In the first case, utilize the inherent compensatory mechanisms system suppres ses the negative consequences and comm completely very come of disturbance , but the second - it begins to assort down , degrade. However, to a certain signal the system bay window maintain the office to heal itself , and thusly to irreversible processes that lay or basically alter the system - it is reborn , goes into a different fictitious character .\nAccording to the theory of biotic regulation , since its inception biological science not only adapt to the environment , but it provided a powerful moldable influence , growing as biota. infra the influence of biota formed a controlled environment , dapple developing the take over regulatory mechanisms most biota. The result was a highly organized system - the biosphere , which flows by means of proper margin of nutrients ( substances involved in the functioning of the biota ) provides unparalleled precision control of all the parameters that are measurable for the biota ( forcible and chemical characteristics of the mood , air, soil , start water , and the demesne Ocean) , at a wide range of variation of perturbations.